Archive for the ‘music’ Category

Art. Now.

February 28th, 2010

Sometimes, people who make money with music decide it’s time to stand up for something and use their work to create a major change. Now here’s the punchline: The last time this happened was in 1984, when Harry Belafonte persuaded Ken Kragen to produce a single, the song for which was written by Lionel Ritchie and Michael Jackson. Only a few months before Bob Geldof had done the same in Great Britain. Both songs, We are the world and Do they know it’s Christmas, are larger-than-life art. Not because music is a form of art, but the very idea behind these specific pieces.

They were, and still are, quite rightfully massive successes, not only because they were performed by the most famous singers (and musicians) of their time, but because the ones who created them were so passionate about what they were doing, that you must be deaf not to hear it.

In the meantime there have also been natural disasters like earthquakes in Haiti or Chile, Tsunamis in South East Asia, drought in Africa. The world is still in massive need, maybe more than ever. But it seems that it needs cataclysmic events — only that some folks gather up and re-record a 25-year old piece of music. And today, it’s yet another song. As a person who loves music, it sickens the hell out of me to hear a piece of crap like Artists for Haiti. Who are they trying to kid? One moment I thought “Hey, is that Stephen Hawking singing? No wait — it’s some guy with an autotune and vocoder effect. What the bloody hell??” (Apologies to Mr Hawking.)

This is not art. This is not passionate. This is not authentic. It’s just a scam, a cheap stunt. I’m not buying it. If you are not passionate enough to make this your quest, to put your own sweat and blood into this, I won’t believe your story. Never.

When there are more than 50 artists people who happen to have a gross fortune of more than 1,000,000,000 (yep, that’s one billion) dollars and they decide to make a record that generates, say, 25 cents net profit per copy that could go to charity, and every other American buys one copy, that’s about 40,000,000 dollars going to charity. You’d have 25% more if everyone participating gave 1M like that. But why should they, right?

Art has become really, really scarce nowadays. Which should encourage everyone of us feeling the passionate urge to do art to overcome our inner resistance and start doing it. Now.

TV, the Industry, the Web …and us

February 23rd, 2010

Sometimes thinking up a post takes a little longer because you’re trying to come up with (at least) one phrase that sets it apart, make it stand out, and frame it. Check.

The other day I had a conversation about the previous post with a good friend who has been like a mentor for me over the last years. He said this was all good and true, but there’s one thing the Web can’t do but the old alliance can: Make a star. A real star. Someone (or maybe even something) that people will look up to. What they will buy (including merchandise). The Web might be too specialised, too fragmented to build a massive movement.

Two thoughts — First: Industry has designed stuff that’s average so a lot of people would buy it and it would become a success. Aim for the centre and you’ll land a hit. Limit choice and sales go up, because people want to spend money on something. The Web took away the need to adapt, because now you don’t make the most profit from creating average stuff for the masses, but valuable stuff for small groups who are willing to spend disproportionally large amounts of money on their favourites. Or Amazon’s endless shelf space. We don’t need average anymore.
Second: The central (perceived) idea of the Web is that everything is free. Which is why people or incidents can become famous quicker than ever, free spreads faster than anything, gets passed on because people want to be part of it. This is the downside for the industry — once they decide to pick up the idea and monetize it, it’s over. Now it’s not free anymore, people have been robbed of what was “theirs”. It’s quite an impossible task to persuade somebody to give you money for something that has been free until the day before. This is why the “Web Stars” are rarely successful to cash in via selling themselves to the industry. What works, with music for example, is to go on tour and play hundreds of club gigs in venues you can easily fill. If you’ve got millions of hits on the Web, chances are a number of people in every town know you, some will be passionate enough to tell their friends, and presto! Sold out.

TV has a problem. In and of itself, it’s out of date. TV is Nixon, The Gulf War, Golden Girls, Coca Cola. Because this is what TV has been (most of the time) in the last 40 years. Not only TV of course, the whole system mentioned before. Designed to deliver from factory to family. But it also fed another need which is one of the essential human needs: stories. We all need stories, they’re part of our community, our culture. ManU fans thrash the crap out of Leeds fans during the football season, but when England plays Germany they’re brothers in arms. This is because of a story, the need to belong, to identify.

The Web has a place for everyone, but it’s always distant, not personal. And just because a bunch of people who are passionate about something gather on the Web, it doesn’t mean they will inevitably create something that is of value for them or others. Search YouTube for [insert name of your favourite series] for fan videos. You won’t be watching them for long, I reckon.

And this is where the future of TV is (at the moment). They’ve got enough people to come up with ideas, plots, characters, everything you need to create good stories, and what’s more, stories people can easily relate to because they (optionally) include regional aspects. This is something Hollywood can’t do, they must be bigger, louder, fancier than last time, and more average in their stories. When you’re making a TV programme, you don’t have to. You only have to accept that there is no centre any more. Accept that “safe” is gone and “cheap” has been taken by the cluttered Web.

Juggling 2.0

February 10th, 2010

Some years ago, many musicians were very intrigued by the idea of doing business on their own. Booking shows, doing PR work, writing a song, do some HTML homepage programming, CD layout, write another song… The way of spending your time seemed quite stable and reasonable (whatever that may be).

Then came mySpace. And everyone had to get in. New activity: Figuring out how to have your own layout. Individual artist homepages got dumped. MySpace was the place to be. Then came Facebook. MySpace was declining, everybody went on to create their artist pages on Facebook, allowing for more connections but a less individual look. But hey, content matters, right? Then came Twitter. No look at all, no content. Just… another place to waste your time, figuring out what to say in 140 characters. But you had to have it. Totally connected. Boiling point. And now: Google Buzz! Artists collapsing all over the place.

They start complaining (quite rightfully) that they cannot handle all these connections without spending so much time on them that they practically don’t creeate music anymore. Mission failed.

Here’s my advice: Get off mySpace, it’s no use but a dead end. Have a blog, on Typepad, WordPress, Blogger or whichever you prefer. Just select a theme you like and add your images. Set up a bit.ly account that hooks into your Twitter account and automatically shortens the links you post. Go to a service like twitterfeed.com which hooks into your blog’s RSS feed and automatically posts to Facebook, Twitter and whatever they support. If you’re using Gmail, Google Buzz is now built in and can automatically re-post your Twitter tweets (but not vice versa). There. All done. Now go make some music. The web takes care of itself.

Still audible

January 29th, 2010

Finally, I get to write a post about music. Not exactly music though, more audio production, but that’s musical enough.

In the last few years almost every classic analog console or channel strip has become available as at least one software plugin, most of them from renowned software manufacturers. And because everyone believes they are good enough, Digidesign proudly set up a listening contest to check if you can distinguish between an original mix on a SSL4000 and Waves’ plugin which models the very same.

Here I am, sitting in my office with 10+ busy colleagues, my Beyer DT770 headphones connected to the regular output of my Dell notebook. Just to make clear that this is not a high end listening environment.

And still I am able to distinguish between both mixes! Not 100%, but 2 out of 3. Also worth mentioning, I didn’t do any mixing in the last months. So how could I figure? The problem that audio software still has is delivering a proper stereo image. A software mix just doesn’t sound as balanced as an analog mix. On a digital mix the center seems to drop about 1 or 2 dB, and also the depth seems to shrink a little, making the sound slightly cramped.

Still good to know that there’s room for improvement for the software guys, and some relief for the analog gear manufacturers that their products are not as easy to be replaced. Not yet.