Archive for the ‘personal’ Category

Business and people

January 24th, 2012

Obviously some real estate agents think their business is not people.

Do you remember when it happened the last time that a website you visited was down, not because of technical issues, but because of a design overhaul? And all they could do is put up a ridiculous graphic (not the “under construction” road sign, thanks a lot), with their phone number and email (not clickable). No contact form, no replacement microsite, and in the end, no business, at least from my side.

There is no business that is not people.

Do vs. Get done

January 23rd, 2012

One of the best ways (if not the best way) to amp up your productivity is asking “What can I get done?”, replacing the misleading “What can I do?”. There’s a reason David Allen didnt’t call his book “Doing things”, y’know.

 

Treasure

January 11th, 2012

On most occasions, your personal treasure won’t increase when you desperately try to pile more onto, but calmly let go of some of it.

On revolution

January 10th, 2012

The earth does one each day. We can be happy to accomplish one in a lifetime.

Aftermath

October 7th, 2011

It’s strange how our worldview can lead us to being judgemental about elementary things such as death and how we cope with it.

Instead of reaching out and being grateful for having an insight to what is a very personal issue for most of us, people mis-seize the opportunity to lecture. It’s hypocritical. We can only feel what we do feel. It’s no use when someone keeps telling me I should think of the many people dying in developing countries. In hospices. In accidents.

My standard question: And then, what happens?

It’s post-middle age philosophy that we’re all equal and are to live up to a preposterous moralic standard dictated by reason. If I don’t know what it’s like, I cannot relate emotionally, and then I’m just displaying vain insincere political correctness.

It’s a choice.

 

(My) Perspective on Death

October 6th, 2011

For me it’s amazing how my perspective on death has changed over the years. The older I become, every loss of a family member, a friend or even someone I’ve only known from the media feels more severe. Today it occured to me that it’s not as much how close you were with a person as it is about how this person’s actions have affected you and your life, which is a different dimension of being close. And the older I become the deeper my understanding and appreciation of someone’s contribution and achievement becomes, because I realize ever more how little of what we take for granted really is, and how hard you need to push to get things done, how hard it has been for them.

I think Steve Jobs himself passed away at peace. For what I know from media coverage, I think he did achieve what he wanted to. He did show us that it is possible to turn your vision into reality, not only once, but many times. He proved time and time again that you can build success against many odds, over decades. At his company, he has established a culture that will allow their success for many years to come. Even outside Apple, everyone has enjoyed the opportunity to witness this transformation and learn from it. The incorrigible naysayers won’t admit it’s not been just luck, sure, even if he had done it a hundred times again.

On the other hand, my heart goes out to his family, his wife, his children, his close friends. It’s a terrible loss. I am sorry.

On speed

September 18th, 2011

You (i.e., you personally, your organization) only have to hurry if the goal you’re pursuing is being pursued by others too.

Other than than that, you can (and should) take your time. And use the opportunity to verify your goal is indeed a good one going for at all, and right now.

More on data vs. information

August 30th, 2011

I’ll just blast out some thoughts I had during the last few days…

  • There is no correlation between the amount or quality of data and the amount or quality of information. Example: “I don’t use a DSLR camera for filming because it’s not good enough.” This opinion (information, subjective) does not require anybody to know all the facts. Everybody has a different threshold when they feel having sufficient “information” (it’s data) to make a decision, change or define their worldview and tell themselves a story. The data which is not included in the story becomes irrelevant. Trying to persuade them differently is unlikely to yield success then.
  • On Air Promotion trailers: The less data you need make the viewer feel informed, the better. The worst thing you can do is give the audience too much data. The factual data should no more than name and time of the show. Everything else better be a story people can connect to (and for this to happen, any emotional reaction is what you want, not only positive ones). Don’t give them data, because then they’ll start putting all the input into context themselves and stop listening. You don’t want that, of course. This applies to advertising in general as well.
  • The previous part also applies to presentations. The purpose of a presentation is to give information by present data in a narrowed context. This means you (the presenter) need to boil down the data to a level as simple (yet still correct) as possible. Do not show complicated charts or graphs (and worse, reading them to the audience). What’s on the screen or whiteboard is only supplemental to your verbal argumentation. It is not the information.
  • Do we really need compilations of references? At least their compiler should have the decency not to label it a “Guide” or similar. Because it’s not. It’s a directory, index, compilation, collection. Yeah I know. People love Guides and How-To’s. People love “not getting scammed” even more.
  • We need to train and force ourselves to decide on the spot more often, because it is often that we do have enough data and information to decide on the spot, but we’ve so gotten into the habit of “digesting” and “sleeping over it” we’re just too slow.

The Information Myth

August 25th, 2011

Sometimes, when a term has been coined, it’s hard to get rid of it albeit it’s plain wrong. As it is the case with “Too much information!”. I don’t know where it came from (and don’t intend to research it now, feel free to post it in the comments), yet it is unimportant for the matter of the fact. So how did I come to this conclusion?

Last week, German newspaper Die Zeit published an article citing a study among managers and their biggest issues on the job, resulting in ten rules a good manager, according to the paper, should follow. Let’s just say the author would have better read some books on the topic, yet he seemed to prefer the blather. But that’s not why I’m writing this.

The study revealed that one of the most pressing problems of managers is the amount of decisions, which requires a lot of information for each of them. Obvious. To decide, you need information. Now, what is information?

I like Fredmund Malik’s definition that information is knowledge that leads to action. Now, if you think about it for a few seconds, how much of the things that enter you brain in the course of a day do lead to action? Indeed, very little. What’s the overwhelming majority then? It’s data. When you look up the definition of data and information at Wikipedia it’s all there, though I don’t agree that a book with all data about Mt. Everest automatically becomes information. Data only becomes information when it is put in a context that leads to an action on your behalf.

Looking at all the bits and pieces we’re dealing with daily that way, it’s plain to see why making decisions is such a massive time-consuming process. It’s not information we’re dealing with on the input side, it’s data that we must put in perspective, be it an analytics report, a movie clip, the latest news. It’s not that we (as humans) were producing ever more information, we’re just producing ever more data which in turn we must filter out to obtain information.

Now, is what I’ve been writing about in these few lines data or information to you? Since we will keep producing ever more data, the ability to distill data to information will become key to future success for anyone, because all success depends on the ability to make decisions. This necessity requires not only organizations of every kind to teach their employees how to get better at this, it also requires schools to switch from teaching young people to learn everything from a limited resource (i.e., a school book) to learning the process of filtering out the irrelevant data from an unlimited resource (i.e., the Internet). For the careful reader, the previous sentence has turned data into information. Thank you for reading.

The pro, the amateur and the idle

August 19th, 2011

The amateur learns what she wants to learn because it’s part of what she loves to do.

The idle learns what he needs to learn because it is required.

The pro learns what she can learn, because there is no reason not to.