ideasarehere

April 21, 2010

Shopping and wish lists

Filed under: business,marketing — Erik Dobberkau @ 07:24

More out of scientific interest than personal need I went to the Media Store and investigated through the shelves, especially DVDs and CDs. Worth noting: TV Series almost take up as much shelf space as feature films. People buy this? Whoa.

And then – for the first time in three years – I actually bought a CD. Because it was cheaper than on iTunes. Jeff Buckley — Grace, it’s one of those albums you must have if you are into music. Awesome. And I’ve been wanting it for quite some time but never saw it in stores. After that, I picked up another CD I thought of as nice to have, and another…and another. And then I stopped, thinking “Wait, what’s going on here?” and I remembered a blog post I had read some weeks ago when the author mentioned that people in the checkout queue always seem to be more excited than after having actually bought the items. Which made me think, resulting in me putting back 3 out of 4 CDs, thinking it would make a lot of more sense to put them on a wish list. Which is a clever option on Amazon.

On the one hand, it allows me to keep track of stuff I think I need, reconsider it after some time, but in the end, thanks to the recommendation system as well, it keeps ever growing. Wish lists are also great to share with your friends and family, so every time they want to give you a present they have some sensible options instead yet another pair of socks.

On the other hand, from Amazon’s point of view, wish lists are a precious source of information, because they tell them what the client thinks he needs. This applies for you as a marketer as well. It’s a good tool to follow up, because it’s connected to future intentions and not the last purchase. The way the list grows is a valuable information too (though prone to error because of misinterpretation). Fast growth and widely spread topics can be indicators of indecisiveness and procrastination, or the tendency of taking on too much at once. But this is something you only know when you have the opportunity to measure and compare the results. It’s interesting that Amazon doesn’t track this but keeps bombarding you with recommendation emails whatsoever, which is not always helping them make another sale I reckon, so you better not copy it straight away for your business. But following up is vital. The more relevant (i.e. centered on the client’s future) the better.

April 20, 2010

Billboards for laggards

Filed under: business,marketing — Erik Dobberkau @ 10:15

Today I saw a billboard ad with the iPhone 3GS on it, and the text  below it read: “iPhone 3GS. The fastest, most performant iPhone ever.” Of course this ad was not one for Apple but a mobile service company. Still I couldn’t help but wonder if they really thought they’d need to advertise it that way. It’s not like someone who is only slightly into tech doesn’t already know that. In fact, all early adopters are already slavering for the 4G to come in summer, ready to dispose of their 3GSs.

The effect the billboard has is quite opposite to what its creators wanted it to be. First, the strongest association is not between the mobile service and the claim or the phone, but between the phone and the claim, so people are very likely to misinterpret it as an Apple ad. Second, it’s meant to appeal to an audience that is not going to act on it. Third, using a row of superlatives in connection with “ever” is already bad enough, but doing in the face of the new model of the product coming soon, it’s just plain stupid. The interesting thing about this is that the fraudulent touch it has will not be associated with the mobile service but Apple.

And just imagine they would (quite rightfully) try to prevent third parties to commit mistakes like this, what an outrage this would result in. So once again they have no choice but to stand out. I’m pretty sure they will. Any takers?

April 19, 2010

Take care of the time

Filed under: creativity,personal,workflow — Erik Dobberkau @ 06:00

There’s a saying that goes “Take care of the dimes and the dollars take care of themselves”. No need to explain, it’s a no-brainer. But what I was thinking the other day is that we tend to pay little attention to our dimes of time. Email here, Facebook there, just a little peek over to Twitter, and hey, I could check out if there’s someone new I know on LinkedIn. Have a smoke. Repeat. Do this often enough in a single day and it’s two hours or more gone. And I mean gone. Dead time.

But we’re pretty good at finding excuses afterwards to justify what we did, right? So, if they’re only half as reasonable as we pretend (already getting nervous here?), make a list, a plan for tomorrow, on which you write down everything you do including all these “filler” activities (you can have multiple instances of the same item, because you’re at least checking your inbox twice a day) and for each item on this list, write a good reason for executing this activity with the given amount of time.
Like this: “9.00 a.m.: Check private email, supposed to take 1 minute, will be 10, because I’ll spontaneously decide that more than one particular email will be so subjectively important that I can’t reply later.” If you don’t feel any pain when you’re writing this and going through it afterwards, really nothing it all, I recommend you hand it to your boss, she can certainly help.

The challenge is to replace these bridging activities with ones that create value. You were clever enough to discover your old ones, I’m pretty certain you’ll find some new and useful ones too.

April 18, 2010

Pricing matters

Filed under: business,marketing — Erik Dobberkau @ 09:26

In every buying decision the price of the good or service is a sensitive issue, which in return makes it a sensible topic to talk about. Recently I spoke with two people about this and the conversations went quite similar although both of them work in different professions. But in the end, it boils down to the same factors.

If I go out to buy a brand new car, for instance, I pay not only for the materials it’s built from, but also the working hours of the people in the factory, R&D, shipping and (they never mention that) the advertisements that brought me to the dealership in the first place. The negotiable part is the dealer’s profit margin. The car manufacturer himself has set a price that allows him to reach the BEP after selling, say, 10,000 units. After that, it’s all profit, so they could lower the price — but what for? People are already willing to pay the old price, accepting that this is what you need to sacrifice to enjoy the benefits.

What I’m really paying for, though, is none of the above. What I’m paying for is the (all inclusive) experience from seeing the ad for the first time, dreaming of driving the car, buying it, really driving it, maybe brag about it, and, some day, dispose of it. This becomes more obvious when we examine commodities. When I buy some chunky chocolate fudge cookies, the cookies themselves have been paid for ages ago, what I’m paying for today is the cookie experience, or, more precisely, the story I’m telling myself about the cookie experience.

The better the quality of the story I’m telling myself, the more it fits with the facts of the product or service, the easier it is to bring myself to pay the asked price. If a lump of gold has a story no one relates to, it won’t sell even for 50% off.

This is why references are valuable especially in service businesses. They help your prospects tell themselves a story about you. And this is what your job as a marketer actually is: Make it as easy as possible for your clients to tell themselves a story that permits them to pay your price. This is the reason why every successful marketer’s first rule is to listen to the prospect. Because only by listening you will find out what they need to know to tell themselves the right story.

Here’s the tough part (though it’s very easy): You have to be (brutally) honest to yourself and (courteously) honest to the prospect, meaning if you can’t give the prospect what she has asked for, don’t ever try to make things up just to win the tender. What you really want is to gain a business that creates future business. If chances are you will fail the first one, maybe you’ll get paid but the door will be closed afterwards. So make sure you really can do what your prospect is asking for. If not, there’s no harm in saying: “Look, I’m best at XY, but from what you’re saying I think what you are looking for is YZ. I could do this, but I’m not the leader of the field there and I want you to get as much out of this as possible. Maybe I can refer you to a friend of mine who is an expert at YZ, she could really help you make giant leap forward.”

By doing so, you do several things simultaneously:

  • show you really care about your prospect’s interests
  • create rapport and trust because you’re honest
  • clearly position yourself as the expert in your field without big fuss, created a story for yourself
  • show you’re connected to other experts and created a story for them
  • without even mentioning it, you have managed to justify your price and the price of the person you’re referring to

The last point is crucial. In services, people have less problems paying a premium price for experts than paying an average price for a semi-expert — the Long Tail in action. In certain businesses the competition has shifted to be only about price, and this is definitely not where you want to go, because the only way is down.

Here’s why: When you charge 100% price, you deliver more than 100% performance, because you have to prove that the experience you’re giving to the client is worth this 100% of money (or even better), so you do everything necessary to make sure they’re completely happy. Otherwise the likelihood of getting equal future business for an equal price or even better business for a better (i.e. higher) price will drop. But if you agree to do the job for 80% of your asking price, your client still demands 100% satisfaction, which is now less likely to happen because you are less motivated — which again results in further price droppings in future business because word of mouth will not work in your favour.

Of course there is always someone who will do it for less. But how can you grow a business by doing more for less? The answer to market pressure is not to work more for less, trying to keep the margins, because you have no scope for investments. This is the circle that killed the classic industry years ago. And this is also what kills start-ups in their first years (not exclusively though, but it’s a huge factor). The question is this: How much would you have to pay if you were to replace yourself? With what you’re charging now, could you do that? While maintaining the same level of quality of customer experience?

You can win more business (over time) by not taking every business (in the short run). Creating a remarkable customer experience is more important than ever. Underpromise and overdeliver. Also point out results you can’t guarantee. A Personal Trainer can only guarantee for her input (training plans, diet plans, motivating the client), but not for the actual results. These vary upon the commitment of the client. This applies in other fields as well, but with different cirumstances (never forget: the client is always right).

One final word about re-negotiating: Don’t.

April 17, 2010

Thin Slicing in practice

Filed under: business,internet,marketing,personal — Erik Dobberkau @ 06:00

In Blink, Malcolm Gladwell writes of a phenomenon of human behaviour he calls Thin Slicing. Seth shares a good (and funny) story how this can turn out in practice.

April 16, 2010

Connected vs. contactable

Filed under: business,personal — Erik Dobberkau @ 18:11

Gavin has some good insight on this.

I don’t know

Filed under: business,personal — Erik Dobberkau @ 07:49

Currently reading Blink, Malcolm Gladwell helped me discover an interesting phenomenon we’re confronted with on a daily basis: I don’t know. In his context the starting point is a bit different from what I mean, but it leads to the same results.

People are afraid of not knowing. That’s why they they prefer to be the ones asking the questions and not the ones who would give the answer (some might have trouble giving an appropriate answer, but that’s a different story). The common notion is that not knowing is the same as being stupid, which is not the case. In fact, making things up in order to pretend, that’s stupid. “Stupid is as stupid does.”

The worst case scenario is of course when not knowing is combined with passing the buck — and the one who gets it passed does know. Bummer. People are sometimes very likely to manoeuver themselves into trouble by trying to stay out of it the easy way. Maybe it’s because we as a society, or as part of a corporate culture, have ended up believing in the story of zero tolerance for failure. This is the heritage of the industrial age, when a machine had to work flawless 24/7, and manpower was just peripheral in order to feed it.

I think this is not the case any more, so we can stop pretending that it were. But how long it will take for this insight to seep through — I dont’t know.

April 14, 2010

Apple has a point

Filed under: IT,marketing — Erik Dobberkau @ 06:00

Lately there was a lot of buzz going on because Apple has restricted the rules for app developers for the iPhone. They must not use cross-compilers to create their software but use the tools Apple gives them. This incurred some displeasure with the community, because many programmers were looking forward to use tools that would allow them to develop their apps platform-independent and compile them for Android, iPhone and what have you simultaneously.

But Apple’s policy makes perfect sense. Cross-compilers can induce errors in the executable app that can not be seen in the source code, because it’s an entirely different language. It’s like having a simaltaneous interpreter when you’re talking to someone whose language you’re not speaking. You don’t know if the interpreter is exactly saying what you were saying to him. No chance of verifying the output.

Also, programming software for Apple computers has meant starting from scratch ever since. You have to use an entirely different framework than on a PC. Never heard any complaints about that. Quite the opposite is true, many developers prefer Apple’s tools.

But the most important point is this: Apple knows perfectly well that if too many faulty apps are being released, this will not affect the programmers. Not at all. It will only affect Apple as a platform and as a brand. They have worked almost 30 years to build their reputation of “switch it on and it works straight away”, they will never ever put that to risk. Would you? Of course not.

April 13, 2010

Presentations are underrated

Filed under: business,creativity,marketing — Erik Dobberkau @ 20:00

Not as an event, of course. What I’m talking about is how to make and deliver them, understanding the mechanics that separate a good presentation from a bad one.

Most of the presentations I was attending were horrible. Today’s one was no exception. The company I’m currently working for got an intern whose job is to keep track of the shooting projects and as a little extra, we were told, he was good at doing Powerpoint stuff and could help us set up our presentations. It turns out that knowing Powerpoint has nothing to do with knowing how to set up a presentation (which is why I prefer to do it myself).

You’ll guess what’s next: We saw slides literally covered with text, 8 bullet points with 2 full lines of text each, and the ones who were presenting had the printed version in front of them, reading from the top. Layout was absent. No sense of typography. You had no idea what the point of each slide was.

In case you forgot: The purpose of a slide is to help you sell what you’re talking about. No less, no more. Keep your audience focused, because the purpose of a presentation is to make one or more points. Details are for the handouts you can give away afterwards. Always make stuff you would want to see. When in doubt, ask someone who has a sense of design. Keep it simple. Practice before you step in front of your audience. And double-check on spelling.

April 12, 2010

When the buzz is gone

Filed under: business,creativity,internet,marketing,media — Erik Dobberkau @ 15:42

So many marketers are thinking about how to create buzz for their product or service but not what to do when it is over. Like other marketing tactics before, the lifespan of buzz is getting shorter. And then, what happens? You’re yet another Facebook page, yet another Twitterer… in the end, clutter. If the buzz remains just what it is and doesn’t stick or lead to action — basically: make people care — if it doesn’t do that, it’s like fireworks: boom, wow, gone, so what.

It’s more and more important to have a sensible long-term marketing strategy. Buzz doesn’t accomplish that.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress